Project: Draft–Critique–Revise Content Machine
Deliverable: a working 3-role loop (writer, critic, editor) that produces a publishable piece of content on any topic you give it. Steps: 1.
The prompt
CRITIC role for my loop: Score this draft 1-5 on: hook strength, specificity, structure, and CTA clarity. For any score under 4, give one concrete fix. Output JSON: {"scores":{},"fixes":[]}.
Draft: [PASTE]What to replace
Swap these placeholders for your own details before running the prompt:
[PASTE]your own value
Pro tip: Keep the rubric to 4 criteria max — critics with 10 criteria produce noise, not direction.
How to use this prompt
- Copy the prompt using the button above.
- Replace [PASTE] with your own details — the more specific you are, the better the output.
- Paste it into Any model and run it.
- If the answer feels generic, add constraints: audience, length, tone, and what to avoid. That single change fixes most weak output.
Learn the technique
Project: Draft–Critique–Revise Content Machine
Final Project — Ship a Self-Correcting Loop · Loop & Agentic Engineering
Related prompts
Critique-and-Revise Loops — ChatGPT
A loop is simply feeding a model's own output back to it (or to a second prompt) for review and improvement, repeated until a quality bar is met.
ClaudeCritique-and-Revise Loops — Claude
A loop is simply feeding a model's own output back to it (or to a second prompt) for review and improvement, repeated until a quality bar is met.
ChatGPT / Agent toolsThe ReAct Pattern (Reason + Act)
ReAct loops interleave reasoning ("what should I do next?") with actions (calling a tool, searching, running code), then feed the result back in before reasoning again.
ClaudeGiving Loops Memory
For loops that run over many steps (research agents, multi-turn assistants), summarize prior steps into a short running memory instead of replaying the full history every time — this keeps context small and cheap..
Any modelPlanner–Worker–Reviewer Teams
The most robust agent architecture is also the simplest: a Planner decomposes the goal into tasks, Workers execute one task each with narrow context, and a Reviewer checks results against acceptance criteria before anything ships.
Any modelLoop Budgets and Failure Handling
Production loops need budgets (max iterations, max cost, max time) and explicit failure paths: what happens when the Reviewer fails a result three times? Options: escalate to a human, fall back to a simpler method, or return a partial result flagged as unverified.